Viewing 23 posts - 1 through 23 (of 23 total)
  • Can Lego be called porn even though Lego folk have no genitalia?
  • TheSwede
    Free Member

    Posted a pic of some Lego folk in compromising positions on this thread
    http://www.singletrackworld.com/forum/topic/fantastic-2
    and it was removed by the mods with an email saying that it maybe Lego but it’s still porn. This made me laugh but then consider the rationale behind this censorship. Lets face it, how could you make porn with no genitalia? Eunuchs do Dallas? Remove the hair and anyone could be forgiven for waking up after a few jars with a same sex Lego partner. It’s not porn, it’s just naughty Lego!

    ernie_lynch
    Free Member

    how could you make porn with no genitalia?

    You can’t ….. that’s why the Lego porn stars in your removed post had huge knobs.

    TheSwede
    Free Member

    Oh yeah 😀 I mean they were just Lego lolly pops being sucked by a hot Lego lady who needed cool refreshment.

    GlitterGary
    Free Member

    I’m still more worried about Stephen Hawking cracking one off.

    GlitterGary
    Free Member

    TheSwede
    Free Member

    Yeah, just because he is a theoretical physicist and cosmologist genius with CH, CBE, FRS, FRSA after his frikin name doesn’t mean you can get away with masturbation in public even if it is by the medium of Lego.

    TuckerUK
    Free Member

    PMSL, I’m sorry, that’s too funny. Is this site run by Americans by any chance?

    ernie_lynch
    Free Member

    doesn’t mean you can get away with masturbation

    I’m fairly confident that he can’t do that. And as far as engaging the services of a helper is concerned, I believe that it is no longer technically “masturbation”. Although don’t quote me on that – I’m no expert in the subtle differences between solo sex and a hand job.

    sweepy
    Free Member

    I’m no expert in the subtle differences between solo sex and a hand job.

    Just a keen amateur then 🙂

    Harry_the_Spider
    Full Member

    What about this?

    bigyinn
    Free Member

    HTS why the jar of vaseline in the background? 😯

    Harry_the_Spider
    Full Member

    Small bore exhaust.

    bigyinn
    Free Member

    Is that a euphamism for something else?

    tazzymtb
    Full Member

    Bless you swede and other silly sods, it’s threads like this that make STW great, rather thab all the bedwetting hand wringing angst and PC cack that pollutes the place these days.

    TheSwede
    Free Member

    Lifetimes and possibly Lego willies are too short 😉

    MrsToast
    Free Member

    Eunuchs do Dallas

    Eunuchs have penises, just no testicles.

    TheSwede
    Free Member

    Middle eastern eunuchs (of the Ottoman Court Harem- 1465-1853 & the Dolmabahce Palace 1853-1909) may have had either their testes removed or all of their male genitalia removed. Black eunuchs often had everything removed, whereas white eunuchs tended to have only their testes removed. White eunuchs were banned from harem access around 1582, perhaps because some could still penetrate females in the harem.
    Sorry for the cut n paste.

    votchy
    Free Member

    Stephen Hawkins voice <I am the commodore> those from the Clent Duffers (TM) will understand 😀

    MrsToast
    Free Member

    I salute your superior eunuch knowledge, TheSwede!

    TheSwede
    Free Member

    Mark, who’s the commodore 😆

    Cougar
    Full Member

    It wasn’t Lego porn, it was just a lady relaxing with a couple of young studs.

    Drac
    Full Member

    It was a Lego lady practising her skiing technique.

    TheSwede
    Free Member

    penetrate females in the harem

    Cough

Viewing 23 posts - 1 through 23 (of 23 total)

The topic ‘Can Lego be called porn even though Lego folk have no genitalia?’ is closed to new replies.