[Closed] Ragley Ti - Owner's Opinion[s] ?

There are a few 18in and 20in Ragley Ti's out there, though I'm not sure who exactly.

Just ordered all my Ragleys for the Shops today, should have a Ti demo built at some point soon but im due my Ti frames at the end of the Month. They look lovely though 😀

Graphics for the BluePig are also fab!

Cheers V10 - does your shop start with R?

*nods*

More clues needed.

Watch the @ragleybikes twitter account shortly 😉

got some non ti ones on the way to us. not sure exact dates though.

Infact that's just reminded me.

Brant YGM. 😉

Had a good gawp at Ed's pre-production one at Lee Quarry the other week..

Looks nice...

*Starts counting pennies... *

want me to get you one Nick? special mleh8's rates...

no ride reports or pics then ?

😆 Ooo, Genks, now that sounds like a plan...

the_lecht_rocks - Member

no ride reports or pics then ?

I'm surprised you can't just make one up based on a few chosen key phrases. Just as long as you mention the butyl tubes, you should have them eating out of your hand.

druidh - butyl tubes ? you've lost me ?

[blatent plug] I have 18" Ragley Ti in stock now....[/blatent plug]

Matthew

tlr - people can detect the chemical make up of tubes just by riding them,

apparently.

no really. apparently.

oh and i wanted to ask you a few q's about a cddb...

I'm an 'owner'. I just didn't pay. Don't hate me.

[img] [/img]

There are more pics of my bike here if you haven't seen them already.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/11871535@N02/sets/72157617385509366/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/11871535@N02/sets/72157615944682846/

I'm an 'owner'. I just didn't pay. Don't hate me.

people who pay get better stickers too 😉

TLR - direct question - have you requested a test ride of a Blue Pig at Blazing Saddles?

Hijack!

Ed-O: are you willing to talk about the BluePig and Mmmbop or has Brant sworn you to secrecy?

Our Ti will be in soon and we're making plans for our Blue Pig demo's 16" and 18" planned and yes that is a blatant plug. http://www.ride-bikes.com

Ed's is far nicer than Brant's.

That's the only two actually being ridden, no?

Stickers? how about some lazer etched graphics? That would impress me.

I could have ago at engraving one with a old school compass if you like? be cheaper than a lazer 😆

Stickers? how about some lazer etched graphics? That would impress me.

I'm sure someone can do it, but I prefer scotchbright pads and a fresh sticker kit when you want to make it look nice again.

That's the only two actually being ridden, no?

No. The first mini batch of 18's and 20's (Ti) are nearly sold out. So they must be somewhere (one is at Chevin).

When you say "sold out" do you mean sold to shops or sold to punters? Just curious...

"Sold out"???

Ah. I thought you were suggesting something.....

Brant - No, I have not requested a test ride at Blazin Saddles.

When you say "sold out" do you mean sold to shops or sold to punters? Just curious...

To shops, and then to punters.

Brant - No, I have not requested a test ride at Blazin Saddles.

Someone put 2 and 2 and got 5.
Cheers.

i've had a go on one for a couple of hours and didn't get on with it at all i'm afraid. It was incredibly rigid, and the very slack head angle and longish chainstays made it ride like a much bigger bike. Found it very difficult to flick it about in the singletrack. Bars were too low for me though, but that were no spacers to adjust the height. It did kind of made a bit of sense when the trail got really steep. I think it would be good on faster more open descents, but it didn't really work for me as an all rounder.

Ed-O: are you willing to talk about the BluePig and Mmmbop or has Brant sworn you to secrecy?

I've only really ridden the Ti.

HH - it's certainly designed for steep/tech/fast, and not "an allrounder" as such, though happily with a steep seat angle it'll bimble about nicely if you want to. Long chainstays? 16.5in? Depends what you're coming from I guess???

The rack mount on the dropout is only for a cheeky "yes love, it'll fit a childseat" so owners can get it past the wife.

How does this compare to a Ti On-One 456?

Newer therefore better. Thats why Lecht is having one 😉

Am surprised at less than glowing review!

How does this compare to a Ti On-One 456?

Guy Kesteven, is at this very moment, finalising a review of the Ragley Ti - having swapped the majority of parts straight off his On-One Ti 456. Though I made him fit a shorter stem.

I am keen to see the results 🙂

Am surprised at less than glowing review!

HH previously said he thought there were too many Ti hardtails. Happily that means if this one isn't right for him, there are others. Ti Ragley is certainly different from a bunch of others out there - which is fun. Choice is good.

To shops, and then to punters.

Wow impressive, I guess that's on word of mouth alone...

HH previously said he thought there were too many Ti hardtails. Happily that means if this one isn't right for him, there are others. Ti Ragley is certainly different from a bunch of others out there - which is fun. Choice is good.

I was commenting more on the fact that a BR product was given impartial consideration rather than just getting raved about...and interesting to see that it's not meant to be an all-rounder. I wonder how long the market will bear this type of frame and what the next cycle will be.

interesting to see that it's not meant to be an all-rounder. I wonder how long the market will bear this type of frame and what the next cycle will be.

A counterpoint might be "I wonder how long the market will bear expensive non-specific "all round" frames" 😉

I'd bet indefinitely! Given that most folk, even those with more than one bike, want a bike that does everything rather than focusses on one type of riding.

I just want my bike to be able to be able to go up, down, over and along things for a few hours.

the expense of a "non-specific all-round frame" is lower by definition, surely?

I'm a bit concerned about the slacker head tube geometry. What about running this kind of bike with lower forks e.g. wound-down or a lot of sag, the equivalent of 100mm? Is that going to steepen it up enough to make it more all-round?

Don't suppose any Bristol shops are planning to stock one for test riding?

cynic-al - Member
...I wonder how long the market will bear this type of frame and what the next cycle will be.

Well they are designed by the guy who was responsible for all those On-One frames you see everywhere, so I expect the "market" will be quite happy to buy them.

lol @scruff.
fwiw, i'm not having one - i'm overly happy with my Ti456, but VERY interested in comparison.
my 18" Ti456 runs with Van32 15mm BT's on a short Thomson 50mm stem and is a perfect fit (i'm 6' tall long arms and legs).....new 2010 FLOATS on their way as they're lighter , equally as strong and new, so i'll grant you that one 🙂
the notable difference i can see is the HA on the Ragley is slacker.
what I like about the 456 is the short HT and directness of input, even on a 70mm stem, it is massively direct.
however, I'm really interested to read comparison of the Ti456 and Ragley as they're designed and fabb'd by the same guys.

I'm a bit concerned about the slacker head tube geometry

Concerned? How so?

Don't suppose any Bristol shops are planning to stock one for test riding?

I'm sure we'll have a dealer in Bristol in the next couple of weeks. Rocky Mountain Cycles in Cardiff have them though - that's not TOO far away.

no dealers in NE Scotland then Brant ?

Are there any people in NE scotland? 🙂

no dealers in NE Scotland then Brant ?

No dealers in NE Scotland *yet*.

[i]Concerned? How so?[/i]

Well I've never ridden a bike that slack up-front so I don't know how it's going to feel on my normal trails. A few people have commented that they don't really like the steering feeling - I guess they are used to 69 degrees, as am I. But I intend to run a 90-130 U-turn fork so maybe it's more normal feeling with the fork wound down, just winding it out for steep bits. I was also thinking of getting a small with big 2" riser bars despite me being 5' 11", because of the long top-tube.

Yes I might consider a little trip to CwmCarn via Cardiff for a go before I buy a frame (mmmbop or bluepig) 🙂

BTW. I do think the frames look nice and I'm excited by some of the innovations.

69deg head with a 100mm fork at ride height (25mm sag).

BB drop goes to 31mm which is 12in exactly.

Seat angle is 75degs! Wow! Time trial all the way home.

great angles on paper , just dinnae ken how it all 'synergises' 🙂

paulosoxo - Member
Are there any people in NE scotland?

They're still trying to find their way back from Dalby...

Are there any people in NE scotland?

Too many white settlers from darn sarf that's for sure. It's pants here stay away. Have you tried Wrexham?

Buzz do you really worry about it that much..? seems like a load of angst. I recently bought a Chameleon, I don't think I'd be able to talk sensibly about the geometry/tube lengths of the thing.

I intend to run a 90-130 U-turn fork so maybe it's more normal feeling with the fork wound down, just winding it out for steep bits.

Why not just run it out at 130 all the time? Much less hassle, more fun. Betterer.

my ti456 is betterer @ 140mm............

are you suggesting the Ragley's better @ 130mm than 140mm or just better longer in general ? [i assume the latter]...

Why not just run it out at 130 all the time? Much less hassle, more fun. Betterer.

thats what will be doing, albeit on the steel or ally version.

It's pants here stay away. Have you tried Wrexham?

He's right. You wouldn't like it. Really. St Austell would be a better bet.

nickc - I've seen your cham on here; it's lovely. Saw one in the flesh recently too - short looking - and rad.

I'm already infatuated with the look of the Mmmbop. But slacker geometry is unusual so it seems a bit of a risk. I just don't want to be disappointed with the ride I guess.

Now if I could test ride one at CwmCarn, that would be very worthwhile

are you suggesting the Ragley's better @ 130mm than 140mm or just better longer in general ?

If he's got a 90-130 fork, running it at 140 is going to be hard.

But slacker geometry is unusual so it seems a bit of a risk. I just don't want to be disappointed with the ride I guess.

OK - here's one we discussed on tonights ride. When was the last time you wished your head angle was STEEPER during a ride? When did you wish your steeering was faster/more nervous/more twitchy?

Now even on my Ragley, on the Steps of Death tonight, I wished "heck, I wish it was a bit slacker". But I can't build a bike JUST ride down the Steps of Death. That's silly. I need to man up, and get used to it. And sure enough, I got down it just fine.

Tim was out on his on-one Super Slack Summer Season Sample I made at on-one. Remember the Summer Season was 2degrees slacker than the 456? Well this Slack version is 2 degrees slacker than the Summer season - so 4degs slacker than a 456.

And he's running it with Fox 36's at 150mm.

And it's ace.

Slack headangles just flat out rock. High speed, low speed (with a nice short stem and wide bars), it's ace.

It's like cheating. Honest.

Slack just works. Especially on long travel hardtails. Point. Ride. Smile.

Dead good.

[i]"When did you wish your steeering was faster/more nervous/more twitchy?"[/i]

ah now I recall a choice bit of slotted, twisting, smooth singletrack on down the Quantocks I first rode on my big barred HT which is inclined to have solid but bus-like steering characteristics.

And then the first time riding it on my TranceX - I swear it cornered twice as fast - it was like a rollercoater ride - out of control - brain only caught up when I got to the bottom - goggle eyed.

Now I cannot really attribute the difference to headangle, BB height, top tube length, whatever.

Heck, I'm just going to have to test ride one aren't I?

Point. Ride. Smile.

Dead good.

nickc - I think that's the best summary I've ever read.

Love it!

nickc - I think that's the best summary I've ever read.

Love it!

I thought it sounded cringe worthy

you know, I've never worried about geometry when out on a ride.

See this is the thing, I can well believe that slacker is better for steep, Calderdale down hills and doesn't make much difference to the slow slog back up, but what I can't quite fathom is how it is going to work slicing through woodland singletrack? Most of my local riding is gently undulating forest trails, all twisty and narrow but fundamentally lacking in elevation changes, which I would imagine is the complete antithesis of the riding in Calderdale. I guess the shorter stem helps speed up the steering a bit, but still, I quite like having fast, responsive steering so that I can weave my way between the tree trunks a fast as possible.

Steps of Death

any pics

you know, I've never worried about geometry when out on a ride.

I am sure a lot of the time it's just a bike-designer worry thing I do.

any pics

Video?

slicing through woodland singletrack?

We have that too.

Steps of Death

Of course, not to be confused with "the gentle steps of slight bruising" 😉

aptly named then!

I - briefly - rode a Ragley Ti back to back with a Hummer, that was quite interesting given that it wasn't really Ragley-friendly terrain. The Hummer felt very conventionally sweet and balanced and quite 'ti like', if that makes any sense. The Ragley was more of a blunt weapon sort of thing, kind of more solid up back and the steering definitely needed slightly more heft and it felt sort of longer and, strangely enough, slacker, but there was something intriguing about the Ragley, felt like there was a really interesting, slightly different bike in there itching to get out on the right terrain - steep things mostly. Reckon it'll work well on steep, rocky, techy things, but probably pointless if your main riding is sweeet, smooth, singletracky stuff.

Hmmmm... you can tell I don't test bikes for a living eh. On the steepness front, I've mainly been riding my Pace RC405 recently, with quite a lot of sag out back so the front is slacker than it would be. When I bust the brake hose - under BB routing - I was back on the Rockyvento for a few rides and was quite shocked by how twitchy it felt in comparison, though I did adapt to it, which is human and what generally happens. Anyway, I'd love to run a Ragley in the Peak for a few weeks and see what it did, I suspect it'd be really, really good on the techier things, but equally if you want 'classic titanium', it's probably not the frame you need.

Those Calderdale steps really are an acquired taste aren't they...

Steps of Death

any pics

any grid references/google map locations?

there are some fun steps up by the molehills, I think you lot call the same area Mario Land or something.

theflatboy - any grid references/google map locations?