>One of the nice things about riding in the hills is that we elitist clowns don't meet many nasty aggressive berks. <
LOL – an unintentional insight into the same kind of mindset that positioned the vast majority of the "trail centre initatives" where we currently have em…
David – save yourself a lot of work. There were two reports produced by TRC consultants: these identified all the current and potential mtb ( primarily forest)locations together with detailed poulation zones / travel times and a critique on access, ground conditions etc for each.
This lurked (albeit briefly) on the FCS site but was swiftly removed once it was discovered and folk started debating the real issues. Pretty sure it is or was on the Carron Valley website – have trawl through there and you'll probably find it.
IIRC the forests capable of delivering the most bang for the buck ( population wise) were Fauldhouse and surprsie surprise – Carron Valley. Aberfoyle was close behind…
The trouble was / is that all these assessments were based on accessibility within 1hr (by car) and were framed using tourism models. The social, sporting, health issues were really only touched on.
Bottom line imo is that it's clearly very much easier for those who dceide where these centres are built, to plonk them in nice fluffy places -like the Borders 😉