Not defending the man or anything, but if the sample is (warning – meaningless science from the press)”400 times below the legal reportable limit” then surely the UCI can’t do anything ??
And how did this get in the press anyway ? How about some comparisons for example test 50 people who live around his way and see what their level is ?
Before destroying a man’s career based on bad science and bad journalism.
(again, not defending cheaters, just saying this is pish)
And liking how the NZ press refers to Cycling as “Other Sports” when what they really mean is “Those Weirdos Who Don’t Play Rugby – What Are They ??”